libstoken1

Software Token for cryptographic authentication - shared library

stoken is a software token which generates one-time passwords compatible with RSA SecurID 128-bit (AES) tokens. SecurID tokens are commonly used to authenticate end users to protected network resources and VPNs, as OTPs provide greater resistance to many attacks associated with static passwords.

libaravis-0.6-0

glib/gobject based library for video acquisition using GenICam cameras

GenICam standard provides a generic programming interface for all kinds of cameras and devices. Aravis currently implements the gigabit ethernet and USB3 (Since Aravis 0.5.x) protocols used by industrial cameras.

libx2go-utils-perl

Perl X2Go::Utils package

X2Go is a server based computing environment with - session resuming - low bandwidth support - session brokerage support - client-side mass storage mounting support - client-side printing support - audio support - authentication by smartcard and USB stick

libsss-sudo

Communicator library for sudo

Utility library to allow communication between sudo and SSSD for caching sudo rules by SSSD.

libstdc++-10-dev-armel-cross

GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (development files) (armel)

This package contains the headers and static library files necessary for building C++ programs which use libstdc++.

r-cran-whatif

GNU R evaluate counterfactuals

Inferences about counterfactuals are essential for prediction, answering what if questions, and estimating causal effects. However, when the counterfactuals posed are too far from the data at hand, conclusions drawn from well-specified statistical analyses become based largely on speculation hidden in convenient modeling assumptions that few would be willing to defend. Unfortunately, standard statistical approaches assume the veracity of the model rather than revealing the degree of model-dependence, which makes this problem hard to detect. WhatIf offers easy-to-apply methods to evaluate counterfactuals that do not require sensitivity testing over specified classes of models. If an analysis fails the tests offered here, then it is known that substantive inferences will be sensitive to at least some modeling choices that are not based on empirical evidence, no matter what method of inference one chooses to use. WhatIf implements the methods for evaluating counterfactuals discussed in Gary King and Langche Zeng, 2006, "The Dangers of Extreme Counterfactuals," Political Analysis 14 (2) <DOI:10.1093/pan/mpj004>; and Gary King and Langche Zeng, 2007, "When Can History Be Our Guide? The Pitfalls of Counterfactual Inference," International Studies Quarterly 51 (March) <DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00445.x>.